Earlier today, Lt. Governor candidate Aaron Regunberg posted to Facebook honoring the victims of what is known as the “Saylesville Massacre.”

Mr. Regunberg’s account of this event is incredibly misleading.  According to Wikipedia, several thousand textile strikers picketed the local mill (very few of whom were associated with the mill) with the intent of shutting it down.  Although many of the workers at the mill chose not to strike, some did, and the mill had hired replacement workers to fill their positions.  The strikers were there to make sure they would not be able to do there jobs.  When two of the strike breakers tried to push their way through the picket line, the union protesters physically prevented them from doing so.

A Providence Journal article from September 8th, 2009 stated, “Joe Deslauriers said that his father worked in the mill for 44 years and was inside the Sayles plant when union protesters surrounded it.  For days, they couldn’t leave the mill…”

According to the Rhode Island Jewish Voice in an article published on August 19th 2016, The Rhode Island State Guard was called in to stop the union protesters from harming individuals.  The article states, “The Rhode Island State Guard attempted to move the strikers towards the cemetery, and a riot broke out.  Strikers and guardsmen ran into the cemetery, seeking cover and vantage points.”

The Providence Evening Bulletin reported on the incident  on September 12th, 1934 in an article that stated, “The most stubborn fighting occurred in the Moshassuck Cemetery.  Here hoodlums hid behind tombstones and pelted the troops with large rocks and other missiles…when the guardsmen with rifles and bayonets and clubs charged into the cemetery, a pitched battle developed over the long dead, and charging feet tore up clods of earth from the graves.”

At the end of the fighting, one striker was dead and several injured.  The most famous historical parallel to the Saylesville incident was the “Boston Massacre,” an event that was propagandized and distorted from the very beginning.  John Adams, future President of the United States and founding father, successfully defended the British Troops in a court of law and convinced the Jury that the troops had been attacked with rocks, ice, and clubs before the shooting began.  Also, witness testimony confirmed that the order to “fire” was not given by the commanding officer, but by one of the protesters, an order erroneously followed by one of the British Troops.

In short, the victims of the Saylesville incident were not shot at because they were, as Mr. Regunberg claims, “standing for better pay and a union.”  They were shot at because they violently attacked Rhode Island Guardsmen, after starting a riot, after threatening replacement workers and private property.  Such tactics by unions were commonplace at the time and continue to this day.

As Libertarians we believe in the right of people to organize and form unions in the private sector.  What we DO NOT believe is that those unions have the right to physically threaten individuals or private property, and we DO NOT believe that they have the right to wage violence when uniformed officers try to protect those individuals and property from immediate harm.

 

About the author: Liberty RI

Liberty RI is an independent, libertarian media outlet focusing on local, regional and national issues that impact Rhode Islanders as well as insight into the philosophy of libertarianism.

This article was written as a collaboration of staff and volunteer contributors and has no single author.

Liberty RI is not an outlet for the Libertarian Party or the Libertarian Party of Rhodes Island and does not speak on their behalf. Views expressed on this site are of the authors and or the editorial staff only.